Fillings vs. crowns — that is the question. These dental tools can repair teeth damage, so which one is the best solution for you? There are many factors to consider in choosing an option, from costs to procedure length to durability.
No matter what your dental concern is, there is an ideal option for it. This article will discuss the core differences between fillings and crowns to guide you in your decision.
For fractured teeth or cavities, our dentists often recommend fillings or crowns. Sometimes, we can use these treatments interchangeably and offer both as alternative options. However, we usually recommend one over the other to address specific needs.
In most cases, our standard solution for decay or cavities is dental fillings — either porcelain, silver amalgam, or gold. If we find the damage during the early stages, dental fillings are an effective alternative.
On the other hand, dental crowns function like tooth caps for severely damaged teeth with structural impairments. Crowns use the same materials as fillings, and specialists design the former to look and feel like natural teeth.
While fillings and crowns aim to repair damaged teeth, they have core differences. Below are some of the factors that set them apart from each other:
At Austin Dental Specialty Group, we consider the following factors to answer the usual fillings vs. crowns questions we get:
When dealing with tooth damage, early detection is essential in preserving teeth. Apart from bi-annual visits, we recommend seeing a trusted Austin dentist when you experience spontaneous toothaches, tooth sensitivity, and pain when eating or drinking anything hot or cold. We can usually save teeth with fillings if we detect decay early on. However, severe damage requires crowns. Request an appointment now to get your teeth fixed and get your confident smile back.